Call Us Today: 1-800-923-3456

Deportation

Removal (Formely Deportation/Exclusion) Court Proceedings

Any deportation or exclusion proceedings commenced on or after April 1, 1997 are removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings.

Secretary Napolitano Announces Deferred Action Process for Young People Who Are Low Enforcement Priorities

Almost any violation of your status in the U.S. can potentially result in your being placed in removal proceedings. These violations include, but are not limited to:

  • Entering the U.S. without inspection
  • Entering the U.S. without proper documents
  • Entering the U.S. through fraud
  • Improper re-entry after deportation
  • Conviction of an aggravated felony
  • Involvement in prostitution
  • Becoming institutionalized at public expense within 5 years of entry
  • Becoming a public charge within 5 years of entry
  • Failing to obtain permanent residence after being granted conditional residence through marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident
  • Narcotics addiction
  • Violation of laws relating to controlled substance
  • Assisting another alien to enter the U.S. illegally
  • Conviction of possession of an automatic or semi-automatic weapon

When a person is charged with being removable, they are issued a charging document called a “Notice to Appear” (formerly called “Order to Show Cause”). This begins the process that requires the foreign national to appear before an Immigration Judge and demonstrate why he/she should not be removed (deported or excluded) from the United States.

The immigration attorneys at Garces, Grabler & LeBrocq are highly experienced and will analyze your case, and when legally possible, present a case in court to help you to remain in the U.S.

When an Immigration Judge has found that an alien is illegally present in the U.S., it does not mean that the person must be deported. Our attorneys have successfully litigated all types of Immigration Removal Proceedings.

The most common forms of relief to avoid removal are:

  • Waivers of excludability and deportability
  • Cancellation of removal for permanent residents (formerly 212(c) waiver)
  • Cancellation of removal for non-permanent residents (formerly suspension of deportation)
  • Adjustment of status to permanent residence
  • Political Asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding of removal under Article Three of the Convention against Torture
  • Legalization and Registry
  • Voluntary Departure

Waivers

The immigration law lists various grounds by which a person in removal proceedings may apply for a waiver. All waivers require proof of “hardship” or “extreme hardship” or “extreme and extraordinary hardship” to close family members that are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, if the alien were to be removed from the U.S.

For example, a person who has committed fraud or a material misrepresentation to obtain an immigration benefit or a benefit from a governmental agency (ie., motor vehicles) may apply for a waiver under INA Section 212(i) if his/her removal (deportation) from the U.S. would result in “extreme hardship” to his lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse or parents.

There are various waivers for criminal convictions, prior deportations, unlawful presence, 2-year foreign residency requirement for J visas, and health grounds.

Cancellation of Removal for Permanent Residents

An order from an Immigration Judge granting Cancellation of Removal has the effect of pardoning for immigration purposes the crime that formed the basis for the alien’s deportability.

An alien may only receive one grant of cancellation of removal in his/her lifetime. This order granting cancellation of removal allow the person to keep his/her lawful permanent residence. An order denying this relief is an order of removal (deportation) from the U.S.

To qualify for this relief, the person:

  1. Must have been a lawful permanent resident for a minimum of five years.
  2. Resided continuously in the U.S. for a minimum of seven years after being admitted to the U.S. in any status (the exceptions are listed below) prior to the institution of removal proceedings (service of notice to appear).
  3. Must not have been convicted of an aggravated felony.
  4. Is not inadmissible from the U.S. on security grounds.

The following persons may not apply for cancellation of removal:

  • Certain crewmen
  • Exchange visitors (J visa) who received medical training in the U.S.
  • Persons who have persecuted others
  • Persons who have previously been granted cancellation of removal, suspension of deportation or relief under Section 212(c)
  • Persons who committed certain criminal offenses prior to the accrual of the required seven years

An Immigration Judge will balance certain positive factors and negative factors in determining whether an alien should be permitted to remain in the U.S.

Some positive factors include:

  • Close family ties within the U.S.
  • Health of family members
  • History of employment
  • Community service
  • Service in U.S. armed forces
  • Length of residency in the U.S.
  • Ownership of property and business
  • Assets in the U.S.
  • Payment of taxes
  • Rehabilitation
  • Remorse
  • Hardship to family members

The negative factors include:

  • Failure to pay taxes
  • Misrepresentation in court
  • The nature and circumstances of the removal ground
  • Criminal record
  • Other evidence of bad character

The positive factors must outweigh the negative factors for there to be a favorable decision by the Immigration Judge.

Cancellation of Removal for Non-Permanent Residents

This law allows the Attorney General (usually an Immigration Judge) or the Board of Immigration Appeals) to cancel the removal of a non-permanent resident from the U.S. if:

  1. He has been physically present in the U.S. for a continuous period of ten years prior to the institution of removal proceedings. (This requirement is not applicable to persons who have served a minimum of 24 months in the U.S. Armed Forces, was present in the U.S. during his enlistment or induction, and is either serving honorably or has received an honorable discharge). Continuous means that the person cannot be out of the U.S. for more than 90 days at a time or 180 days in the aggregate, during the ten-year period.
  2. He has been a person of good moral character for ten years.
  3. He cannot be inadmissible under INA Section 212(a)(2) or (3) (failure to register and falsification of documents) or (4) security grounds).
  4. He established exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse, parent or child (Note: not hardship to the applicant).

Cancellation of Removal for Battered Spouses

If a battered spouse is put into deportation or removal proceedings, he/she must demonstrate three years of continuous physical presence in the U.S. instead of ten years for cancellation of removal.

Time toward the three-year period would accrue even after he/she received the notice to appear for the removal hearing. This is different than the one that applies to other individuals where physical presence in the U.S. terminates upon service of notice or commission of a criminal act.

The applicant for cancellation must demonstrate good moral character and must not be inadmissible under:

  1. INA section 212(a)(2) — Criminal and related grounds.
  2. INA section 212(a)(3) — Security and related grounds.
  3. INA section 237(a)(1)(G) — Marriage fraud.
  4. INA section 237(a)(2) — Criminal offenses.
  5. INA section 237(a)(3) — Document fraud.
  6. INA section 237(a)(4) — Security and related grounds.

The applicant must not have been convicted of an aggravated felony. The applicant must also demonstrate that removal would result in extreme hardship. This is a different standard of “hardship” than the other cancellations of removal.

While the battered spouse or child has to demonstrate “extreme hardship,” others need to show “extreme and unusual hardship” to a citizen or resident relative. Extreme hardship alone to the battered applicant would be enough.

Suspension of Deportation

Persons who were placed in deportation proceedings prior to April 1, 1997 as well as NACARA applicants may still be eligible for suspension of deportation. The suspension of deportation is more generous than Cancellation of Removal.

A deportable alien may apply for permanent residence through suspension of deportation if he is able to meet the following three (3) conditions:

  1. He/she must have been continuously physically present in the U.S. for at least seven years. Absences, which are “brief, casual and innocent,” do not interrupt the continuity of the alien’s physical presence.
  2. He/she must be a person of good moral character.
  3. It must be proven that deportation would cause “extreme hardship” to the alien, or his spouse, children, or parents, who are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents of the U.S.

Adjustment of Status

A deportable alien or one subject to removal who is the parent, spouse, widow or child of a U.S. citizen may be eligible to apply to the Judge to adjust his/her status to that of a lawful permanent resident.

Aliens whose priority dates for permanent residence are “current” are also qualified to apply for adjustment of status. Aliens who obtained conditional permanent residence based upon their marriage, or the marriage of their alien parent, to a U.S. citizen who are unable to have their status adjust from conditional resident to that of permanent resident may, once being put under removal (deportation) proceedings, have their application renewed before an Immigration Judge.

Political Asylum, Withholding of Removal, Withholding of Removal under Article Three of the Convention Against Torture

Individuals who have a well-founded fear of persecution if they return to their home country may apply for asylum if their fear is based on any of the following grounds:

  1. Political opinion.
  2. Religious belief.
  3. Nationality.
  4. Race.
  5. Membership in a particular social group and they are unable or unwilling to return to their country of nationality or to the country in which he/she last habitually resided because of persecution or his/her well founded fear of persecution.

If a person is granted asylum, they are able to get work authorization and can, after one year, apply for permanent residence.

Withholding of removal is similar to asylum. But, it differs in 2 ways:

  1. It does not permit the alien to apply for permanent residence.
  2. It only prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (formerly INS) from deporting the alien to one particular country.

Withholding of Removal under Article Three of the Convention against Torture states:

Article 3(1) — “No state Party shall expel, return or expedite a person to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.” In making this determination, the US “shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the state concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant, or mass violations of human rights.”

Article 3(2) — “It shall be the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture, regardless of whether the person is physically present in the United States.”

Legalization and Registry

Once an illegal alien has been found qualified for legalization or amnesty by Department of Homeland Security (INS), the deportation hearing will typically be closed since the alien will have been given or is eligible to receive the legal right to remain in the United States. Those who have filed for LULAC or Meese (late filing amnesty cases allowed under a class action lawsuit settlement may have their cases terminated.

To have been eligible for amnesty, the alien must have:

  1. Entered the U.S. before January 1, 1982, or in the US illegally since that date.
  2. Resided continuously in U.S. in unlawful status since such date and through the date of the application.
  3. Continuously physically present since the date of enactment (Nov. 6, 1986).
  4. Is otherwise eligible.

Late filing of amnesty cases, the alien must:

  1. Establish eligibility for class membership.
  2. Have entry into U.S. before Jan. 1, 1982 and resided continuously in the U.S. in an unlawful status since that date and through May 4, 1988 (J-1 visa holders subject to the 2-year foreign residency requirement are barred).
  3. Show why they did not apply for amnesty (per class membership).
  4. Prove brief, casual or innocent departure from the U.S.
  5. And be otherwise eligible.

Both the amnesty and late amnesty filing deadlines have past.

Registry is another means of attaining lawful permanent residence in the U.S. It is available to aliens who have resided continuously in the U.S. since prior to January 1, 1972, who are persons of good moral character, who are not deportable on certain grounds, and who are not ineligible to become U.S. citizens. One is still eligible to apply for registry.

Citizenship

Anyone that has a lawful claim to U.S. citizenship may have their court case terminated.

Voluntary Departure

A person may pay their own ticket and leave the U.S. within a time period designated by an Immigration Judge if they have not been convicted of a crime and has or can obtain a travel document. If the request for voluntary departure is made to the Immigration Judge before and Individual Hearing, the Immigration Judge has discretion to order voluntary departure up to 120 days.

After the Individual Hearing, if the person can show that he will pay his own ticket, has or can obtain a travel document and has been in the U.S. for at least one-year, has no prior grant of voluntary departure, the Immigration Judge may only grant up to 60 days of voluntary departure and the alien must post a Bond that is set by the Judge. The minimum bond is $500.00. This Bond must be paid within 5 days of the order.

Failure to pay the bond or to leave the U.S. by the date designated by the Judge converts the Order of the Judge to a Removal Order and the individual is barred from any relief and reopening of the case for a period of ten-years. The individual is also subject to a civil penalty of $1,000.00 to $5,000.00.

To speak with an experienced Immigration attorney immediately call us toll free at 1–800–923–3456 or contact us online to discuss your legal matter today.

FREE CONSULTATION

  • captcha
I would highly recommend this law firm to anyone. The service was epicable. Very thorough, efficient and friendly. It was a pleasure having you represent me.
, Jul 8, 2017
This firm is everything a law firm should be in this diversified world we live in today. The entire staff & attorneys are always on top of your legal matter. You can rest & trust that you are going to receive the best legal advice possible. The staff makes you feel at home with them. They are always extremely personable & knowledgeable about whatever issue they are handling for you. I love them & would highly recommend them to everyone & anyone.
, Dec 7, 2017
He helped me fight a battle that I put off for years. Thank you so much for your services.
, Aug 31, 2016
Very helpful in getting speeding ticket points reduced.
, Jun 15, 2016
Buenos profesionales, completamente satisfecho con sus servicios
, Jul 11, 2017
Yo ELSA, estoy muy agradecida y muy feliz de haber escogido como mi abogado. Es un buen y excelente preparado e inteligente ABOGADO. Trabaja muy profesional y consciente igual todo su personal que trabaja en su oficina. Me ayudó mucho con mi Caso. Lo recomiendo a cualquiera persona que necesita sus servicios de un buen ABOGADO.
, Feb 17, 2017
I can honestly state that JONATHAN is an excellant negotiator and timely attorney, whom prepares you for the worst and gets you the best.
, Jun 12, 2017
I would love to sincerely thank you for your patience and assurance during the whole period. It was very easy to get hold of you even on the phone and you always explained things to the best of your ability to me. I would quickly and highly recommend you to anyone who may have a case like the one i had. Thank you.
, Jul 7, 2017
My lawyer was great Mr White and Anita was very helpful returned calls and let me know every step of the way
, Nov 7, 2017
Knowledgeable, helpful, and friendly guy. Thanks for the service!
, Jun 13, 2016
Thanks for everything my life change Good bless thanks
, Jul 21, 2016
Excelentes abogados
, May 8, 2016
Yo estoy muy satisfecha con su servicio gracias abogados de G G. Lo volviera a contratar todas lss veces k los nesecite por su rapides y su eficiencia. Son muy dedicados a sis clientes Gracias
, Jun 19, 2017
Thanks for helping and you have the best service
, Jul 26, 2016
Great representation.
, Nov 3, 2017
Great expletive with Esq Arindo. He is practical, honest, and thorough. I really appreciate his help.
, Jun 16, 2016
Hi, it was a very good experience !! I appreciate all the things the Lawyer did for me, he won the case, thank you so much again, I am 100% satisfied!
, Mar 29, 2017
Jonathan A Kessous did an outstanding job in handling my case. He was able to get the most serious charge and several other charges against me dropped and my fine greatly reduced. I was most impressed with his professionalism.competence and the timely manner in which he responded to all my questions and concerns. This demonstrated to me that I was a priority and not just a client!
, Jun 13, 2016
They have done great work for me and my family.
, Oct 9, 2016
Google
Thank you very much for all your help and great service!
, Mar 22, 2017
Thank you very much you guys were helpful compassionate in my situation I really appreciate the ladys in Perth Amboy are very nice I recently send it a friend and she has the same opinion.
, May 24, 2016
Great job , thank you very much, I'm glad I found you,
, Oct 22, 2016
Thank you Mr. Lawrence LeBrocq, I have no words for the amount of appreciation I have for what you've just done.
, May 9, 2017
very satisfied with the outcome. You did a very good job
, Dec 26, 2016
Buenos profesionales, excelente trabajo....
, Jul 10, 2017
Bill Grabler handled several comp case's for me including permanent worker's comp. He did a fantastic job.
, Jul 21, 2016
Muy bueno y excelente
, May 21, 2016
I was represented by Mr.Araujo from this firm in a disciplinary job hearing. Mr. Araujo was very professional and prepare my case very well and I was able to return to my job a few days after the hearing.
, Oct 5, 2017
Los mejores
, Jul 7, 2017
Best of the best. Thanks you
, Aug 7, 2017
Extraordinary, very satisfied
, Oct 11, 2016
Excellent highly recommended
, May 25, 2016
EL ABOGADO GARCES Y SU EQUIPO SIEMPRE ESTÁN LISTOS PARA DEFENDER LOS CASOS DE LA COMUNIDAD LATNA CON HONESTIDAD Y GRAN PROFESIONALISMO.
, Jan 5, 2017
Facebook
I was satisfied, and the service was very good, my lawyer was very professional and did a great job.
, Feb 3, 2017
Arlindo and Gisela were extremely helpful. They told us exactly what to do, what we could expect and gave us options for working with our situation. Thank you!
, Oct 26, 2017
Estuvo bien gracias muchas gracias
, Jul 12, 2017
I had the good fortune of Mr. Pasquale Vella representing in a matter that I had deemed a bleak one, with no positive outcome in sight. Vella assured me that he would work hard to get me the best results possible, and that is exactly what he did. He worked tirelessly making sure he covered all possible angles, and in the end I was extremely pleased with his services. Vella proved to be diligent, aggressive in yielding results, and very professional, all while maintaining a communicative yet good natured rapport with me as his client. I would most certainly use his services again in the future as well as highly recommend him to anyone in need of a great criminal defense attorney.
, Nov 9, 2016
The Lawyers were very friendly and knowledgeable. If I need a lawyer in the future, they would my go to attorneys.
, Jun 13, 2016
Excelente
, May 23, 2016
Los mejores abogados gran equipo
, Jul 7, 2017
Google
Great people they do help thank you for everything you've done
, Jul 18, 2017
Anna is the best lawyer I ever had the pleasure to hander my case, very knowledgeable in workers comp law, I would recommend to anyone.
, Jul 10, 2017
Felt very well taken care of. Excellent!!!!!
, Jul 19, 2016
Outstanding service very professional attorneys thumbs up all the way
, Feb 4, 2017
MaryanN and Jasmine both very helpful and professional. Jonathan Kessous very professional. Would recommend the firm.
, Aug 5, 2016
Son exelentes abogados muy honestos y muy responsables con sus clientes y sobretodo muy amables poreso yo tengo mucha confianza en ellos y. Poreso los he recomendado ampliamente con otras personas
, Oct 22, 2017
Sarita Núñez vas very efficient. She did everything she could to have the case resolved
, Mar 2, 2017
Google
thank you guys for representing me!
, Jun 17, 2016
I was happy with your service and professionalism with handling my case. I was treated with respect and always told the truth and not half of a story or what I wanted to hear. My team was awesome thank you
, Jul 14, 2017
I would like to say thank you for all your help you've giving me.
, May 24, 2016
Staff was very helpful and explained the case as it went along.
, Jul 21, 2016
Excellent Lawyers and paralegals. They kept me informed and updated on the progression of my case. I was pleased and will be referring others to them. Outstanding customer service.
, Jul 22, 2016
Excellent service.
, Apr 1, 2017
The BEST I WILL RECOMMEND
, Aug 3, 2016
Good job
, Jun 15, 2016
Estoi satifecha por supervisio grasia a
, May 16, 2016
I was very pleased with the service from your firm, especially my attorney Allen, he always returned mu calls and was very courteous.
, Jul 18, 2017
I was very impressed with the professionalism and quick turn-around time from all the participants from GGL that assisted me. I would like to especially thank my attorney Jonathan Kessous. His credentials are very notable he is one of four attorneys throughout the entire state of NJ certified by the NJ Supreme Court as a Trial Specialist in both Criminal and Municipal Court Law matters. My case was very serious and could have resulted in jail time or suspension of my license. Jonathan was able to resolve my case very favorably. I am extremely thankful for his assistance. I would also like to recognize and thank his Paralegal Jasmin Caba and his Personal Assistant Marianne Crisitello for their assistance in communicating and preparing me for my trial. They are a great team and I would highly recommend them.
, Feb 27, 2017
Excellent service John K gets the job done in the courtroom
, Aug 16, 2017
Everyone in the office is exceptional and very helpful. Thank you for helping me win my case!
, Feb 17, 2017
Joe Delgado was the best attorney anyone could ever have! I had a very complicated case but he took it and we won!!
, Sep 28, 2017
I love when a team gets together and get the job done with out me calling to see how everything moving along. I will always recommend this firm to anyone . Go team
, Oct 20, 2017
Great service,would recommend to anybody!
, Jul 10, 2017
Very professional and timely precised on the whole process on my case. My whole process went as lawyer Arlindo explained it to me and no delays whatsoever!!!
, Jul 20, 2016
Google
Awesome job , very pleased with the outcome of my case !
, Jan 4, 2017
Increíbly Professional and dedicated peple to the service of the Law. William Garces has to be One of the Nicest most professional lawyers I ever come across...I know not a lot of people trust lawyers but This firm will treat you with such consideration and dedication that You forget you are a Client. I would recommend this Firm to every Person I know .
, Mar 1, 2017
U guy's r amazing LAWYER'S! I will always recommend u to all my friends and family members. Thank u for going above and beyond with my case. Awesomeness!!!!!!
, Oct 6, 2016
Very satisfied withow my case was handled
, Oct 17, 2016
Sarita was great, she sealed with every detail of the process. i recommend this firm
, Jun 22, 2017
A well-prepared staff who handled everything we asked. Made us feel welcome and handled everything professionally.
, Jun 13, 2016
Estoy feliz por el trabajo que hisieron, gracias por todo.
, Oct 5, 2017
Very please with law firm
, Apr 2, 2017
Muy buenos abogados se los recomiendo
, Jun 8, 2017
Yous are the best of the best thank you for your service
, Sep 12, 2015
They were very helpful and address any questions I had about my case.Great team, very happy overall
, Nov 22, 2017
Google
The best In Plainfield, Thanks Garces+Grabler+Lebrocq for your help! Beating my case and my wife case.
, Jun 15, 2016
Excellent service. Very respected law firm. Will use again and definitely recommend
, Oct 12, 2016
Very professional I'm very happy with their service.
, Aug 29, 2017
Son buenos los mejores abogados buen equipo en general
, Jul 7, 2017
Really good and reliable service This is my second time using your services and I always come out wining.
, Oct 21, 2016
Very professional and know what they're doing which is hard to find nowadays. Arlindo Araujo was very clear, precise, and on point!!!
, Jul 20, 2016
When it comes to traffic John K gets the job done in the courtroom Job Well Done
, Aug 16, 2017
Google
Best lawyer I ever had
, Nov 9, 2017
My lawyer Pat was very efficient on my case and I definitely give GGL 5 stars
, Oct 23, 2016
Great practice they always get the job done for a reasonable price.
, Feb 3, 2017
Very happy with the services provided - was dealing with Arlindo and his assistant Gisela. My case was dealt with in a timely manner, with no errors, and all advice was spot on. Will definitely use them again in the future.
, Apr 3, 2017
Google
Very good
, May 21, 2016
Like to thank u for your profession and with my traffic ticket
, Jul 24, 2016
La atención muy eficaz son muy profesional me sentí muy sastifecho gracias
, Jul 5, 2017
Tuve una buena experiensia confien son los mejore.yo tube dos caso y sali muy bien gracias a ellos
, May 7, 2016
The representation this firm did to me was above and beyond what I expected to receive. Especially Mr. Grabler who was extremely professionals. I was very proud to have him as my lawyer. For this reason I recommend this firm to everybody.
, Jul 19, 2016
It was a slow process..but MR.Kotchta and Evelyn were freaking great..i cant say any more about them to..they always answered my questions in a professional manner while i was being an pain in the butt with them..👍👍👍👍
, Sep 7, 2016
Google
The lawyer Ana bontempo very profesional.
, Jul 19, 2016
Far exceeded my expectations. Mr. Vella was confident and professional. Should I require legal assistance in the future I won't hesitate to call them.
, Oct 21, 2016
Jonathan was brilliant!!! He is an expert in the field of DUI's. He is patient, well prepared and first and foremost he was concerned for the well-being of me and my family... Thanks so much for your representation!!!!
, Jun 29, 2016
G.G.L... Are the best in the business...
, Jan 26, 2017
My uncle had some problems with meals at a Monmouth Count assisted living home. The home charged over $5,000 per month and he was not being offered food that he liked on many occasions and his complaints did not resolve the issue. I called Garces & Grabler on his behalf and they sent an attorney to the home to first speak with my uncle, then speak with the director. Within a few day, his dietary needs were met. Everything was resolved amicably and the law firm charged, in my opinion, a very reasonable fee for their services.
, Jul 12, 2016
Google
100% satisfaction, very good. I like to recommend.
, Jun 16, 2016
Buen trabajo. Muchas gracias.
, Oct 23, 2016
Perfect !!!!!!
, Oct 7, 2016